![]() Quantitative data extraction is not likely, and individual data points must be manually transcribed, with the potential for transcription errors and, of course, more scientist effort. This interface option does have some large negative aspects, however. Setup is limited to purchase of a scanner and a secure compliant storage solution. This interface option is supported by most instrumentation and is relatively easy to implement. With the advent of LIMS and ELN, the paper reports could be scanned and attached as electronic media within a compliant audit-trailed solution. The reports were sized and pasted into paper notebooks. Historically, scientists obtained printed reports from instruments. In increasing order of structure: csv, xml, database table, database query, web service. ![]() Report files are also a maintenance concern since unusual information can result in parsing errors. ![]() Report files are often more difficult to parse since the information is highly formatted for readability. Setup difficulty is a measure of how much effort is required to connect the instrument.Įxtraction difficulty is relevant only in quantitative interfaces and is determined by how well the interface data is structured. There is no need to employ a more complex option if qualitative information is sufficient. The end user requirements should drive selection of this option. The high or quantitative end of the spectrum is a well-structured data source from which individual results with full context can be extracted. The low end of the spectrum is essentially qualitative information such as a scan or picture of the instrument data. Integration potential is the ability to extract specific data from the instrument output. If compliance is not required, simpler, less costly options can be selected. For compliant labs, data custody throughout the interface activities is required by either physical or procedural processes. Security is defined as the opportunity for data tampering. In this article, we will define the interface selection criteria and then discuss interface options. See user submitted job responsibilities for Equipment Manager.The optimal instrument interface is dependent on your compliance requirements, the instrument, the integration outcomes, and, of course, the amount of effort you wish to expend. 1 to 3 years supervisory experience may be required. To be an Equipment Manager typically requires 5 years experience in the related area as an individual contributor. Extensive knowledge of department processes. Has full authority for personnel actions. Ensures that project/department milestones/goals are met and adhering to approved budgets. The Equipment Manager manages subordinate staff in the day-to-day performance of their jobs. Typically reports to a head of a unit/department. Additionally, Equipment Manager requires a bachelor's degree. Tracks equipment quality throughout the product lifetime and makes recommendations for alternatives if needed. Being an Equipment Manager minimizes organizational cost through product standardization and tracking. Tracks the records, licenses, inspections, warrantees, and service agreements for the organization's equipment and tools. Equipment Manager manages daily operations for the equipment procurement, inventory management and maintenance function.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |